The goal after a fight isn’t to win it again. It’s to understand it.
Most couples know the feeling of a fight that technically ended but never actually resolved. Maybe you keep having the same fight over and over again. You both went quiet, someone changed the subject, and the whole thing sank beneath the surface, waiting to come back. Repair is the skill that stops that happening, and it’s one of the most learnable skills in the Gottman Method.
Ok so you fought, you recognise you messed up, and you want to fix it, what do you do next?
Processing, not re-fighting
The mindset shift matters more than any script. Repair is processing a fight that has already happened, not having it again. Gottman’s image for this is useful: talk about the fight like you’re both watching it from the balcony, not like you’re back on stage in it.
If either of you starts getting activated mid-conversation again, that’s a sign you’ve gone back on stage. Pause, take a break and come back to it later.
The five steps of repair
The Gottman aftermath process has five steps, done in order.
First, feelings. Each of you shares how you felt during the fight. Not why, not whose fault it was, just the feelings themselves.
Second, realities. Each of you describes your perception of what happened. You’ll almost certainly remember it differently, and that’s the point. Each person’s reality gets validated, which is not the same as agreed with.
Third, triggers. This is where repair goes deeper than an apology. What past experiences made this escalate the way it did? A partner who goes quiet under criticism often learned that long before this relationship. Understanding each other’s triggers turns a recurring fight into information.
Fourth, responsibility. Each of you names what you personally contributed to the fight. Even a small contribution counts, and naming it changes the temperature of the whole conversation.
Fifth, constructive plans. One thing each of you will do differently next time. Specific and small beats sweeping and vague.
The reporter rule: ‘I heard you say’
When you describe your reality, describe it like a reporter. ‘I heard you say the trip was a waste of time’ rather than ‘you said the trip was a waste of time’. The first describes your experience, which can’t be argued with. The second states a fact your partner may dispute, and now you’re fighting about the fight.
Why validation isn’t agreement
This is where people get stuck. Validating your partner’s reality means saying ‘I can see why this upset you’, and meaning it. It doesn’t mean conceding that their version of events is the correct one. Two different experiences of the same fight can both be real. Once both of you feel understood, the need to be right tends to shrink on its own.
Closing it out
End with the constructive plans said out loud, to each other. ‘Next time I start feeling overwhelmed, I’ll say so instead of going quiet.’ ‘Next time I’ll raise it when it happens instead of saving it up.’ Small, specific and spoken, so you both heard it.
Repair fixes what has already happened. The next post in this series covers the tool that stops issues building up in the first place: the State of the Union meeting.
If the same fights keep coming back no matter how well you repair, that’s a pattern worth bringing to couples therapy. The Therapy Hub offers Gottman couples therapy and marathon sessions in Footscray and online. Reach the team at thetherapyhub.com.au or call 03 9958 8772.
Related reading
Couples therapy at The Therapy Hub
How couples get stuck in conflict
Recent Comments